Without a verdict in the Vuskovic case: “Don’t break people”

AThe third day of negotiations on the doping case of professional footballer Mario Vuskovic also ended in vain. Stefan Oberholz, chairman of the DFB Sports Court, explained on Friday that the procedure was so complicated and the consequences for the 21-year-old footballer so severe that intensive consultations were required. A decision is expected to be announced within the next two weeks.

The defender for Second Division club Hamburger tested positive for Epo on 16 September last year during a National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) practice test. This result was confirmed by sample B.

Vuskovic has been temporarily suspended since November 15. He faces a suspension of up to four years. In his closing speech on Friday, Vuskovic tearfully said: “I have never cheated in sports and never will.” And further: “Every day I hope that this nightmare will end.”

dispute science

This doping procedure has long been a scientific controversy. “This threatens to become an endless story, a game of ping-pong between scientists,” Oberholz said on Friday at the beginning of the third day of negotiations. He was still confident that he could put an end to it and said, “We think we can make a decision today.”

Shortly after 2:00 pm, about an hour after the hearing resumed, the defense and the DFB’s review committee withdrew to prepare their closing arguments. Half an hour later, Oberholz returned to the courtroom and asked for patience. The parties retired for a legal discussion. In other words: the possibility was considered, whether there could be a transaction in this process. But this did not happen, despite intensive discussions.

What makes these negotiations so difficult is the fact that Oberholz didn’t get what he wanted. After the second day of hearings, he ordered another urine test of Vusković and another report.

The DFB Sports Court instructed Canadian doping researcher Jean-Francois Nod to do this. Although in his report he confirmed the results of the analytical laboratory at Kreisch in Saxony, he refused further doping testing. His reasoning: He sees no reason for this. Naud also stated that further analysis would be against the rules of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).

Four experts hired by the defense had previously assessed Vuskovic’s samples A and B as false positives. The defense filed a motion of bias against the appointment of Naud as an expert, which was denied by the DFB Sports Court.

“Honestly all my life”

After the testimony was collected, Anton Nakhrainer, chairman of the DFB’s control committee, said: “I consider this allegation of doping to be proven without any problems.” any difference between systematic and single doping.

“The ultimate goal should not be the destruction of people,” said Nakhrainer and promised: “As a representative of the control committee, I will not formulate any objections to leniency.”

The defense demanded an acquittal and once again expressed their doubts about the extension of the doping tests. “The bottom line is that no doping violation can be found.”

Vuskovic has maintained his innocence from the start. On Friday, he said: “What I and my family have gone through over the past few months, I would not wish on my closest enemy.”

On the other hand, if Vuskovic is found guilty, he could be brought before the German Federal Court. In the event of an acquittal, the World Anti-Doping Agency and the National Anti-Doping Agency will have the opportunity to appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

Source: Frantfurter Allgemeine

Get in Touch

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

Latest Posts